Blog Post 4: Case 2, Grassroots diplomacy
Bella Clark
Ethical Issue: Jack does not want to upset any of the kids
Facts:
- Jack is staying abroad at a youth center for 5 months
- He handed out gifts during a ceremony for the kids and the kids thought they were from him
- 4 kids did not receive gifts during the ceremony, they received black hats instead
- Jack brought up the upset kids to the youth center and they did not care and told him to fix the problem if he thought there was one.
Stakeholders
- Jack
- The Kids in the youth center
- The Youth center itself
- The Management/staff at the center
- The organization that sent the gifts
- Jack’s exchange program
Personal and Professional motivations
| Stakeholder | Personal | Professional |
| Jack |
|
|
| The kids center |
|
|
| The kids in the center |
|
|
| The management/staff |
|
|
| The organization that sent gifts |
|
|
| Jacks Venture |
|
|
Solution 1: Special Gift Event
Give each of the children who did not receive gifts a gift out of your own pocket, something that you possibly brought from home in front of all of the kids, possibly before meal time.
Pros:
- Saves face for the organization and makes it look like they care about the happiness of each individual child
- Reconciles with the children who didn’t get gifts
- The staff does not have to worry about the issue
Cons
- Jack’s personal savings are depleted
- The Kids still feel othered because they were not given the gift in the same time
- The other kids could be confused as to why the four others get special treatment
Solution 2: Black Hat Club
Have a special meal separate from the group with the 4 kids who did not get presents and call it the “Black Hat Club”. Tell them that they were chosen and he had to keep it a secret and tell the kids they got the black hats because they were part of a special club.
Pros:
- Makes the Kids feel like they were not forgotten
- Increases connection with Jack
- 0 cost
- 0 interferences with staff
Cons:
- Might make kids who did not get the hat feel uncool
- Kids still might be upset that they do not get a more special gift.
- Might create the reverse effect and turn the kids with hats into a social hierarchy
I would choose the second option. I feel like this would create a sort of comradery that would help rebuild the relationships with the kids who felt betrayed by the gift situation. It also saves the most face and does not require any extra money or any embarrassment or contact of the organizations involved.
My course of action would be to:
- I started wearing the hat myself
- “Call” a “meeting” of the black hat club and tell them that they have been specially chosen for this exact purpose.
- Make a handshake and do it with the “members” every time you see them.
- Reinforce that the hat is “Cool” thus adding emotional value to the hat instead of it just being a hat. The exclusivity of the hat commodifies it and thus increases the social status of the individual with the hat.
In conclusion, the hat itself has a “lesser value” but by a person of power wearing it, it is essentially a “celebrity endorsement” which makes the hat have an intrinsic value. By doing this, Jack does not appear ungrateful to the donors, makes the kids who got the hat feel special and important, and it leaves the organization Jack is volunteering for out of the ordeal entirely as they have asked. The venture has low impact because they don’t damage any relationships in between the kids and jack as well as the donor and the organization.
One thought on “Blog Post 4: Case 2, Grassroots diplomacy”
Identifies ethical issue: 9/10
Identifies stakeholders and motivations: 10/10
Selects best course of action and provides a thorough analysis of solution and its consequences: 8/10
Defends the best course of action vis – a – vis other approaches: 7/10
Analyzes the impact of the decision on the venture: 7/10
total: 41/50
please relabel