How Steve Jobs’ Love of Simplicity Fueled A Design Revolution

In Isaacson’s “How Steve Jobs’ Love of Simplicity Fueled A Design Revolution by Walter,” he argues that Steve Jobs created the greatest force for innovative design, Apple, through his instinct for simplicity and natural beauty that connects us to the technology.

Isaacson shows how unique Jobs was in the engineering and technology world through walking us through his early years both as a person, and as a technology engineer. It is stated that Jobs’ love for design began with his love for a childhood home—a passion that would remain with him for the rest of his life. Jobs claimed that the original vision for Apple came from his home, which was designed for the “everyman” in the way that it was well-designed, had simple capability, and “doesn’t cost much.” Jobs explain that they modeled their computers on “metaphors” so that they can “leverage this experience people already have.” He wanted them to be playful, fun, and friendly. As a result of this, it evolved to “resemble a human face.” This concept was consistently repeated through the article as being a keystone for Apple Products—being designed from nature and for nature, humans. For example, when the day came for computers to become flat-screens, Jobs found this discomforting and “impure,” and he found his solution by walking through a sunflower field. He thought, what if the screen was separated from the base like a sunflower, suggesting a narrative that the “sunflower shape would convey that the flat screen was so fluid and responsive that it could reach for the sun.” If it is not clear yet, Jobs believed it was absolutely critical to make technology seem as natural as possible—it was new and unfamiliar to people, and to bridge the gap, this commonality was the key. Not only did he want his technology to be simple, he did so with the goal of making great products, not making money. This philosophy was also another fundamental difference between Jobs and other technology creators because with this different goal comes significantly different decisions. Therefore, Jobs displayed a clear goal: create great technology that was simple and for humans, not for money, and this is what led to the decisions that would put his company at the frontline of innovative design for years to come.

I think Isaacson makes really strong and clear points and I really enjoyed reading this article. However, I do find that today’s Apple is far from the Apple Steve Jobs created. Today, Apple products are extremely expensive, and not attainable for everyone. Of course, this is natural as technology grows and prices increase, but even when the first Mac was created, the cost of the computer case for it was three times that of a regular case. Additionally, his partner, Ive, explained how adding a handle to to top of the mac made a “relationship possible” as it made it seem touchable. However, manufacturing this handle costs a lot of money. Hence, I think it would have been important for Isaacson to note that with being appealing to humans and bridging the gap between technology and us comes higher costs for these high-tech features. However, maybe we are willing to pay the cost if we feel that these computers are connected to us in the way Jobs intended them to be.

2 thoughts on “How Steve Jobs’ Love of Simplicity Fueled A Design Revolution

  1. I find it interesting how this article described the origin of apple products to be as “natural” as possible. All of the technology we have today required warming up to. In movies and TV, we see portrayals of AI and highly developed technology, and it tends to scare us; the plot usually reveals its negative implications. However, we have become slowly and steadily exposed to more technology, which in a way primes us and alleviates that sense of fear. Now we even have self-driving cars, and somehow it doesn’t seem that crazy. I think it’s very interesting that the early creators of technology like computers and mobile devices were wary of this and made it a goal to keep their products natural. In truth, an iPhone is quite unnatural, yet it at this point feels within human nature to have them in our hands or pockets at all times.

  2. Jobs was very wise in considering that more people will engage with approachable, easy-to-use and easy-to-navigate technology, something that feels natural, as you said. I think that the misconception of technology is that it must grow more complex in its advancement, but Apple is a prime example of how successful technology production can remain simple to be effective and gain popularity in use by society. Too high-tech of features actually are not as appealing to the public, as it seems, because people in a fast-paced society and daily schedule need the simplest form of communication that they feel confident they can operate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *