Read the two articles (posted on CourseSite) and for each one, list ten (10) good takeaways that you can apply to your project.
“The Wisdom of the Cherry Tree”
- Every small step and small goal contributes to a bigger whole, the sole efficiency and performance of a single unit does not matter, it is the interdependency and being a part of something much bigger that matters.
- “The ‘outputs’ – indeed ‘waste’ – of one process (the cherry tree and its blossoms) have become inputs for other processes.”
- You can not tell the efficiency through one element of the process, you can only tell when looking at the system as a whole
- “The goal is not to minimize the cradle-to-grave flow of materials, but to generate cyclical cradle-to-cradle ‘metabolic cycles’ that enable materials to maintain their status as resources and accumulate intelligence over time.”
- cradle-to-cradles strategies goal is to maintain resource quality and efficiency through many cycles of use which in turn will result in zero waste.
- ‘Zero waste’ cradle-to-grave strategies focus on reduced consumption and ways to minimize waste, cradle-to-cradle strategies create products and processes so that each output becomes a nutrient/ usable element for another system. As each thing is designed to be reused, it creates a cycle of resources being up-cycled.
- biological metabolic system = composting
- technical metabolic system = for synthetic materials and minerals that are not biodegradable, designing these products to be used again and again to get the full value out of that nutrient.
- For cradle-to-cradle designs: “manufacturers lease products such as televisions, cars or washing machines to consumers for a certain period of time. At the end of this time, they take the product back, recover its material nutrients and re-use them for the creation of new products, either by the same company or by a different company.”
- Cradle-to-cradle creates more opportunities at a lower cost and new ways of getting revenue while also ensuring that raw materials stay available for industrial processes.
“Life’s Principles as a Framework for Designing Successful Social Enterprises”
- people have a desire to be a part of something larger than themselves and are more motivated by that rather than monetary compensation.
- Social enterprises strive to reflect deeper ways of thinking compared to non-profit and for-profit organizations, the have 3 bottom lines: people, profit, and planet.
- “long-lived for-profit companies survive in turbulent business environments by adhering to the following philosophies: being sensitive to the environment, maintaining cohesion and identity, reorganizing from negative externalities, and practicing conservative financing.”
- Life’s Principles are ways that nature provides the guidelines for how to function more sustainably by helping us to be in tune with nature and to maximize benefits through minimal effort and resulting in minimal negative impact.
- Nature is works through interdependency amongst simple building blocks to create a complex system.
- Entrepreneurs should apply Life’s Principles while developing innovative business models and technologies.
- “Nature takes a multi-finality approach, meaning that in its systems, the individual inputs, sub-systems, and their interactions all have their own goals met while the system as a whole also meets its goals (Stepler et al. 2010). In a business sense, successful social enterprises embody stakeholder theory to optimize the price to benefit ratios to satisfy all the stakeholders. This ratio can be optimized through multi-functional design that incorporates a range of uses to accommodate for market changes in the future.”
- increase efficiencies and optimize designs –> decrease costs overall
- Social enterprise must leverage interdependence, multiple subsystems must contribute in the process of meeting a goal.
- Use local materials to create a shorter supply chain that minimizes energy consumption, increase efficiency of product so that ot is readily available through easy use and installation.