Based on the feedback we received from our peers, these are some of the things we could have done differently:
- Identify FIVE specific things in your slides that you could have done differently.
-Added more graphs to the slides that included statistics, as the audience claims this is a better visual when discussing numbers
-Added less text
-Bigger font
-Better organization of content on each slide
-Moved some slides to the additional info hidden slide, in order to make room for other things
- Identify FIVE specific ways that you could have delivered your presentation better.
-Looked at the slides less
-Managed our time better
-Made more eye contact with the audience
-Enunciate more
-Project voice better
- Identify FIVE specific ways you could have built your credibility further.
-More measurable data
-more info on prices and exact numbers when it comes to the financial side
-More stats on the need for the project
-More info on community healthcare worker stories
-Make it clear who our customers are
- Identify FIVE specific questions that you could have answered better. What were the questions, how did you respond, and how should you have responded to each?
-Why can’t we make this device not rely on Alexa or Amazon at all?
This questions did not come as a shock, as it is something one thinks of pretty easily, but the answer is complicated on some level, our approach uses an already existing device, we are simply providing the program that Alexa will execute, while the approach the referee suggested is valid and worth looking into, it is not the most feasible for our context. We are much closer to achieving our goal using the alexa than developing our own device and mass producing it.
